You are here:   Dispatches > Teaching China's Anglophiles
 

 In justifying this, one student referenced London's Olympic opening ceremony. He was right. The chief reason why Danny Boyle's spectacle was a success was that it put the nation's split personality on show, projecting an image of Britain that the world recognised and one that Britons themselves could actually stomach. 

Martin Jacques is, of course, correct in stating that, with 56 different ethnic groups and a population of 1.3 billion, China is "more like a continent than a nation". My experience of teaching 35 students in Beijing was admittedly limited. Universities tend to operate as mini-globalised enclaves, attracting those of ample means and atypically liberal views. But my experience should not be entirely discounted.

The fact is that most Western reporting of China tends to revolve around a mixture of fear and misrepresentation. I could have told you about the airbrushed history on display at the Museum of China, the propaganda-filled newspapers, or the fact that I was advised to travel everywhere with my passport. All would have been true, but not a faithful depiction of the country. While it is important to recognise China's poor human rights record, its censorship and lack of democracy, it is equally important not to confuse the state with its people. 

The world has nothing to fear and everything to gain from China's rise. To quote Jacques again: "For the Chinese, what matters is civilisation. For Westerners it is nation." In teaching my students about the British nation, I had learnt much about Chinese civilisation. Indeed, I fear, they had taught me much more than I had taught them.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
sd goh
September 28th, 2013
11:09 AM
Eliza Filby, pardon me for bringing up this point about China being more "a continent than a nation/country." I think it was Bertrand Russell also who mentioned this in his 1922 book 'The Problem of China'. I would like to think that during your time there, albeit a brief one, you most likely would not have encountered this phenomenon which Russell found quite amusing. And that is, at his lectures there, notable Chinese intellectuals would scramble to sit at the back of the hall than in front, to avoid sticking out conspicuously. This low-profile stance could be said to be due to the Taoist teachings in which 'self-effacing' conduct is a marked one .

Ceri Morgan
September 27th, 2013
8:09 AM
Thanks Eliza - this drew a really good picture of the students you taught. I've visited China many times in the last 20 years and have worked for and with Chinese companies, and you'll be pleased to know that the answering of mobiles in meetings is not confined to the young: 40-something business execs do it all the time as well. You quote Martin Jacques, and he is very quotable, but have ever actually learned anything useful from him? His advocacy of China is on the face of it positive, but I do not believe that his big idea, the European Nation State vs. the Chinese Civilisation State, is either accurate or useful, and like badly woven silk it falls to pieces under rigorous examination.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics