You are here:   Anti-Semitism > How the Left Turned Against the Jews
 

Ever since there have been loyalty tests and demands for left-wing Jews to speak "as a Jew" as Howard Jacobson puts it, and announce their shame of and contempt for Israel. The campaign to boycott Israeli universities, to quote the most sinister example, says that Israeli academics must prove that they are not anti-Palestinian before it will allow them to work with the Europeans — in the same manner as McCarthyites insisted that Hanns Eisler prove that he was not anti-American before they would allow him to work in the US.

Finally, who can deny that anti-Semitism was popular in Eastern Europe and Russia then, and is popular in the Middle East and parts of Europe now? Particularly if the more obviously "medieval" features of the prejudice are dropped and anti-Semitism is recast as anti-Zionism.

Leftist attitudes have been extraordinarily consistent. Communism gave way to anti-colonialism. Israel remained a target for special rage, even though Zionism was both a settler movement and an anti-colonial movement that attacked the forces of the British empire. Anti-colonialism gave way to the 1968 rebellions. In Germany, the left-wing terrorists around the Baader Meinhof gang claimed to be against the Nazism of their parents. They proved they were just like their parents when they planted a bomb at a meeting to commemorate the anniversary of Kristallnacht. Today the bulk of the Left has forgotten its old appeals to universal values. Conservatives and liberals are more likely to emphasise the need to assimilate, while the Left "celebrates" diversity and difference — for everyone, that is, except Jews.

I could go on but must anticipate an objection. Sensible and well-meaning people might say, "If hatred of Israel from the Left has been remarkably consistent, that's the fault of Israel and those Jews who support it." They have a small point.

Israel is unique among nations. It is the only sovereign country whose right to exist is questioned as a matter of routine. No other country — not China, Zimbabwe, Sudan or Iran — suffers comparable abuse. Left-wing viewers of the atrocities in Syria must be baffled. Who knew that the Assad family was capable of such crimes? Who told them that anyone in the Middle East outside Palestine had good cause to revolt?

But those who say that the bias of much leftish protest is a reason to exonerate Israel miss the point that injustice in Palestine is still injustice, and people are entitled to protest against it. Anti-Semitism plays a part in Israel-hating, so does the unhappy status of Jerusalem as a sacred city for fanatics from three warring creeds. But many who defend the rights of Palestinians are not fanatics. They may devote disproportionate energy to their cause. They may or may not be blind to the suffering of others. But that is no reason to damn them. They oppose Israeli policy because contrary to the Balfour Declaration it impinges on the civil rights of non-Jewish communities.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
David Zwartz
April 2nd, 2012
2:04 PM
"The Bolsheviks recognised other minorities as minorities with homelands. They never said that there should be a Jewish homeland in their empire." Not quite correct, as it overlooks the (Yiddish-speaking) Jewish Autonomous Birobidzhan region of the late 1920s-early 1930s.

5ftflirt
April 1st, 2012
8:04 PM
"it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing. " You could say that Israel is one of the few countres in the world where ethnic cleansing did not accomplish its purpose. The Jews were ethnically cleansed from their land 4-5 times, by various empires, and always returned. Not too many other peoples can say that. Jews should also have the right of return to their towns and villages, like Shechem (Nablus) and Hebron. And their former homes in Baghdad, Cairo, Aleppo, and Medina.

Ed Walker
March 30th, 2012
10:03 AM
Ruth Fischer was unmasked as an American agent when secret information was declassified in 2010.

Ed Walker
March 29th, 2012
9:03 PM
The usual evasions and red herrings. The examples given such as Australia and Northern Cyprus are entirely different situations. Should the Palestinians, who continue to be denied return, be allowed to live on the land of their choosing? Or will they continue to be marginalized by a state that discriminates against them? That is the question. One that Mr Decent does not address.

Cris
March 29th, 2012
2:03 PM
"Israel is the only nation to be founded on principle of ethnic cleansing" What are you smoking, Ed? Do you have any idea how many Hindus and Sikhs were driven away from their homes when first Pakistan and then Bangladesh were established? How many Germans were evacuated to establish Poland post-WW2? How many Tamils have been driven away by the Lankan army to establish Buddhist enclaves in Sri Lanka? How many Muslims were cleansed by LTTE to try and establish a Tamil state? How many Hindus have been forcibly resettled from Kashmir valley to establish an Islamic state? How many Armenians were slaughtered to establish modern Turkey? How many Jews were driven away from Arab countries? I agree with you that the Palestinian people should be rightly compensated on the principle of human rights and I support the Left in Israel but your blinkered obsession and singling out of Israel indicates that you do have a problem with the Jews, as Nick has so eloquently pointed out.

Erica Blair
March 29th, 2012
2:03 PM
Tony Cliff was a misguided youth who wanted to 'turn an imperialist war into a revolutionary war' whereas one of the leaders of the Stern Gang who offered an alliance with the Nazis was Yitzhak Shamir, who became Prime Minister of Israel. The Trots in Palestine handed out leaflets, the Zionist blew up The King David Hotel - something they still celebrate. Who has more to answer for, the Trots or the Zionists?

Juan
March 29th, 2012
1:03 PM
"That is because it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing." huh? The US, Australia, Argentina, Northern Cyprus? In fact, had there not been a 1948 war, the Arabs would be the majority in Israel by now. The original plan gave Israel only Jewish majority areas. It was the war that expanded it to the 1949 armistice line, and provoked the population transfer between part of the Arabs to the WB, Gaza, jordan and Lebanon and of the Sephardi Jews to Israel. Although ethnic cleansing of Arabs took place in Israel, it pales in comparison to other conflicts. You've just proven Nick Cohen's point.

Gordon Phillips
March 28th, 2012
7:03 PM
Brilliant Nick.

Ed Walker
March 28th, 2012
6:03 PM
"Israel is unique among nations. It is the only sovereign country whose right to exist is questioned as a matter of routine." That is because it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing. Many of us, whether left, right or like me disenchanted with establishment politics, want the Palestinians to have the right of return to their towns, villages and homes. We object to exclusive Jews-only settlements.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.