You are here:   Anti-Semitism > How the Left Turned Against the Jews
 

Three features of the old Left's racism feel contemporary. Naturally, Communists could not say that Jews were members of a "Judaeo-Bolshevik" cabal. They had to recast the conspiracy as a right-wing plot and substitute "Zionist" for "Jew". When Stalin put Rudolf Slansky and other Czech Communists on trial in 1952 the authorities announced: "The whole worldwide Zionist movement was in fact led and ruled by the imperialists, in particular the US imperialists, by means of US Zionists. For US Zionists, who are financially most powerful and politically the most influential Zionists, form part of the ruling imperialist circles of the USA."

Rudé Právo, the organ of the Czech Communist Party, said that Slansky and his co-defendants were "Jewish cosmopolitans, people without a shred of honour, without character, without country, people who desire one thing — career, business and money". Communists and their supporters imagined a vast Zionist conspiracy reaching from the US Supreme Court to Tito's anti-Stalinist supporters in Yugoslavia. For all that, they maintained that they were not anti-Semites but enemies of Zionism. They might have been modern "leftists" talking about the "Israel Lobby" conspiring to organise the Iraq War of 2003, while all the time insisting that there was nothing remotely racist about their conspiracy theories.

The dog days of Stalin also saw a new loyalty test for left-wing Jews, many of whom did not consider themselves remotely Jewish. My grandfather, whose parents had fled to Britain from the pogroms in Lithuania, abandoned his religion and all connections to Jewish culture and became a Communist, as Lenin would have wanted. Objectively, there was nothing Jewish about him. But men like him, who had gladly broken free from their old religious and cultural identities and spent their life serving the party, saw the party use their ancestry to damn them. In Czechoslovakia, any Jew was a suspect. When the secret police imprisoned Artur London, deputy Foreign Minister in the Slansky government, the guard told him that Hitler was right about the Jews and "we will finish what he started".

London was as much astonished as frightened: "This was the first time in my adult life that I was insulted because I was a Jew and was held to be a criminal because of my race — and that by a man from State Security of a socialist country, a member of the Communist Party. Was it possible that the mentality of the SS had risen in our ranks?"

Western Communists of Jewish origin rushed to prove their loyalty by supporting the pogrom; not out of fear of physical violence, for no one could threaten them in the West, but out of fear of the ostracism that would follow a falling out with the Left. Maxime Rodinson, a French Communist who defended the purges, later said that he could not face "the most obvious facts" about the fascistic nature of the Communists because of his "visceral need not to renounce a commitment that has illuminated one's life, given it meaning, and for which many sacrifices have often been made".

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
David Zwartz
April 2nd, 2012
2:04 PM
"The Bolsheviks recognised other minorities as minorities with homelands. They never said that there should be a Jewish homeland in their empire." Not quite correct, as it overlooks the (Yiddish-speaking) Jewish Autonomous Birobidzhan region of the late 1920s-early 1930s.

5ftflirt
April 1st, 2012
8:04 PM
"it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing. " You could say that Israel is one of the few countres in the world where ethnic cleansing did not accomplish its purpose. The Jews were ethnically cleansed from their land 4-5 times, by various empires, and always returned. Not too many other peoples can say that. Jews should also have the right of return to their towns and villages, like Shechem (Nablus) and Hebron. And their former homes in Baghdad, Cairo, Aleppo, and Medina.

Ed Walker
March 30th, 2012
10:03 AM
Ruth Fischer was unmasked as an American agent when secret information was declassified in 2010.

Ed Walker
March 29th, 2012
9:03 PM
The usual evasions and red herrings. The examples given such as Australia and Northern Cyprus are entirely different situations. Should the Palestinians, who continue to be denied return, be allowed to live on the land of their choosing? Or will they continue to be marginalized by a state that discriminates against them? That is the question. One that Mr Decent does not address.

Cris
March 29th, 2012
2:03 PM
"Israel is the only nation to be founded on principle of ethnic cleansing" What are you smoking, Ed? Do you have any idea how many Hindus and Sikhs were driven away from their homes when first Pakistan and then Bangladesh were established? How many Germans were evacuated to establish Poland post-WW2? How many Tamils have been driven away by the Lankan army to establish Buddhist enclaves in Sri Lanka? How many Muslims were cleansed by LTTE to try and establish a Tamil state? How many Hindus have been forcibly resettled from Kashmir valley to establish an Islamic state? How many Armenians were slaughtered to establish modern Turkey? How many Jews were driven away from Arab countries? I agree with you that the Palestinian people should be rightly compensated on the principle of human rights and I support the Left in Israel but your blinkered obsession and singling out of Israel indicates that you do have a problem with the Jews, as Nick has so eloquently pointed out.

Erica Blair
March 29th, 2012
2:03 PM
Tony Cliff was a misguided youth who wanted to 'turn an imperialist war into a revolutionary war' whereas one of the leaders of the Stern Gang who offered an alliance with the Nazis was Yitzhak Shamir, who became Prime Minister of Israel. The Trots in Palestine handed out leaflets, the Zionist blew up The King David Hotel - something they still celebrate. Who has more to answer for, the Trots or the Zionists?

Juan
March 29th, 2012
1:03 PM
"That is because it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing." huh? The US, Australia, Argentina, Northern Cyprus? In fact, had there not been a 1948 war, the Arabs would be the majority in Israel by now. The original plan gave Israel only Jewish majority areas. It was the war that expanded it to the 1949 armistice line, and provoked the population transfer between part of the Arabs to the WB, Gaza, jordan and Lebanon and of the Sephardi Jews to Israel. Although ethnic cleansing of Arabs took place in Israel, it pales in comparison to other conflicts. You've just proven Nick Cohen's point.

Gordon Phillips
March 28th, 2012
7:03 PM
Brilliant Nick.

Ed Walker
March 28th, 2012
6:03 PM
"Israel is unique among nations. It is the only sovereign country whose right to exist is questioned as a matter of routine." That is because it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing. Many of us, whether left, right or like me disenchanted with establishment politics, want the Palestinians to have the right of return to their towns, villages and homes. We object to exclusive Jews-only settlements.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.