You are here:   Anti-Semitism > How the Left Turned Against the Jews
 

Shindler's story of the racism of the anti-racists, of how the far Left turned on Europe's most persecuted minority, does not fit into the preconceived notion that, say what you like about it, Communism was an emancipatory creed. Because his book is disconcerting, I doubt if centrist broadcasters, for whom conventional wisdom is the only wisdom, will review Shindler either. All the more reason, of course, for you to read him. If he has not produced a           secret history, then it is a history of a secret in plain view; an account of facts that are available but not discussed. After I interviewed him at Jewish Book Week, members of the audience said they had never before heard anyone examine the racist strain in left-wing  thinking, even though it was there from the beginning.

The movements for Jewish self-determination and Russian Communism were twins separated at birth. The First Zionist conference met on August 27, 1897, to discuss the escape from anti-Semitic Europe to Palestine. The General Jewish Labour Bund held its first conference in Vilnius on October 7, 1897, to organise the Russian Empire's Jews in a united socialist party. The Russian Social Democratic Labour Party, from which the Bolsheviks split, held its first conference in March 1898. Naturally, the Bund sent delegates. For liberal and left-wing Europeans of the late 19th century, no regime was more repellent than Tsarist autocracy, and nothing better symbolised its reactionary nature than its anti-Semitic pogroms. Jews responded to the terror by keeping their Jewish identity and joining Jewish socialist movements, such as the Bund, or by becoming entirely assimilated Communists, as Trotsky and many others did.

The coincidences of history do not end there. On November 2, 1917, Arthur Balfour sent his declaration to Baron Rothschild that the British Empire would allow the Jewish people to find a home in Palestine "it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities". On November 7, 1917, the Bolsheviks stormed the Winter Palace.

The Jews and the Left were entwined. Many who went to Palestine were socialists determined that the New Jerusalem should be in Jerusalem. Others saw a New Jerusalem rising in Moscow. They could never get on for theoretical and practical reasons. The theory sounded plausible; indeed, for all the crimes the Left has committed, I still half believe it myself. To revolutionaries, Jewish self-determination was a distraction from universal liberation. Anti-Semitism was purely a result of "medieval" prejudices that would wither away as humanity progressed, Lenin said. The Enlightenment had given the Jews political freedom and an "undeniable progressive assimilation with the surrounding population". Come Communism, Judaism like all national, class and religious differences would vanish.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
David Zwartz
April 2nd, 2012
2:04 PM
"The Bolsheviks recognised other minorities as minorities with homelands. They never said that there should be a Jewish homeland in their empire." Not quite correct, as it overlooks the (Yiddish-speaking) Jewish Autonomous Birobidzhan region of the late 1920s-early 1930s.

5ftflirt
April 1st, 2012
8:04 PM
"it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing. " You could say that Israel is one of the few countres in the world where ethnic cleansing did not accomplish its purpose. The Jews were ethnically cleansed from their land 4-5 times, by various empires, and always returned. Not too many other peoples can say that. Jews should also have the right of return to their towns and villages, like Shechem (Nablus) and Hebron. And their former homes in Baghdad, Cairo, Aleppo, and Medina.

Ed Walker
March 30th, 2012
10:03 AM
Ruth Fischer was unmasked as an American agent when secret information was declassified in 2010.

Ed Walker
March 29th, 2012
9:03 PM
The usual evasions and red herrings. The examples given such as Australia and Northern Cyprus are entirely different situations. Should the Palestinians, who continue to be denied return, be allowed to live on the land of their choosing? Or will they continue to be marginalized by a state that discriminates against them? That is the question. One that Mr Decent does not address.

Cris
March 29th, 2012
2:03 PM
"Israel is the only nation to be founded on principle of ethnic cleansing" What are you smoking, Ed? Do you have any idea how many Hindus and Sikhs were driven away from their homes when first Pakistan and then Bangladesh were established? How many Germans were evacuated to establish Poland post-WW2? How many Tamils have been driven away by the Lankan army to establish Buddhist enclaves in Sri Lanka? How many Muslims were cleansed by LTTE to try and establish a Tamil state? How many Hindus have been forcibly resettled from Kashmir valley to establish an Islamic state? How many Armenians were slaughtered to establish modern Turkey? How many Jews were driven away from Arab countries? I agree with you that the Palestinian people should be rightly compensated on the principle of human rights and I support the Left in Israel but your blinkered obsession and singling out of Israel indicates that you do have a problem with the Jews, as Nick has so eloquently pointed out.

Erica Blair
March 29th, 2012
2:03 PM
Tony Cliff was a misguided youth who wanted to 'turn an imperialist war into a revolutionary war' whereas one of the leaders of the Stern Gang who offered an alliance with the Nazis was Yitzhak Shamir, who became Prime Minister of Israel. The Trots in Palestine handed out leaflets, the Zionist blew up The King David Hotel - something they still celebrate. Who has more to answer for, the Trots or the Zionists?

Juan
March 29th, 2012
1:03 PM
"That is because it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing." huh? The US, Australia, Argentina, Northern Cyprus? In fact, had there not been a 1948 war, the Arabs would be the majority in Israel by now. The original plan gave Israel only Jewish majority areas. It was the war that expanded it to the 1949 armistice line, and provoked the population transfer between part of the Arabs to the WB, Gaza, jordan and Lebanon and of the Sephardi Jews to Israel. Although ethnic cleansing of Arabs took place in Israel, it pales in comparison to other conflicts. You've just proven Nick Cohen's point.

Gordon Phillips
March 28th, 2012
7:03 PM
Brilliant Nick.

Ed Walker
March 28th, 2012
6:03 PM
"Israel is unique among nations. It is the only sovereign country whose right to exist is questioned as a matter of routine." That is because it is the only country in the world that was founded on the principle of ethnic cleansing. Many of us, whether left, right or like me disenchanted with establishment politics, want the Palestinians to have the right of return to their towns, villages and homes. We object to exclusive Jews-only settlements.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.