You are here:   Features > What Happens When The Band Stops Playing?
 
Now the orchestra says it cannot meet the rent at the over-bright new Verizon Hall, or feed the musicians' pension pot. Unless someone pumps in a few spare millions, the Fabulous Philadelphians are finished. "What would Philadelphia be without its orchestra?" cry traditionalists. Good question, but it's not the only one. Realists are demanding to know exactly what a city of six million wrestling with post-industrial decline gains from having a costly and cumbersome musical pantechnicon. Who needs a symphony orchestra? That's what they are asking, the world over.

Any competent historian would tell you that the crunch has been a long time coming. Symphony orchestras, evolving in the 1830s to meet subsistence needs of urban musicians and a rising demand for entertainment from a growing middle class, started out by playing music that was fresh and new. Leipzig, Vienna, Paris, Boston and New York led the way; Schumann, Brahms and Dvorak wrote the pops. Berlin gained an independent orchestra in 1882, Amsterdam in 1888, London in 1904, but these were small spring shoots before the big flowering.

The First World War precipitated a public need for musical comfort which, before radio and records, could be experienced only between the walls of a concert hall. The second war redoubled that urgency, audiences rushing to the ink-wet symphonies of Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Stravinsky and Vaughan Williams as to an oracle. By 1950, London had five full-time symphony orchestras, Vienna four, Berlin eight.

Attendance crossed all social barriers. In Angel Pavement, a 1930 novel by J. B. Priestley, a London clerk, Mr Smeeth, takes himself to Queen's Hall on a whim. They are playing Brahms, the first symphony. It was some time before he made much out of it. The Brahms of this symphony seemed a very gloomy, ponderous, rumbling sort of chap, who might now and then show a flash of temper or go in a corner and feel sorry for himself . 

What is significant about this response is that a lower-middle-class man with a very basic education feels that he has the wherewithal to understand great music on his own terms. By the time the big tune comes around in the finale, swelling his heart until it nearly chokes him, Smeeth is lifted out of his woes and endowed with hope for a better future. This perception of symphonic music as an improving grace was widespread. Two out of five Mass Observation diarists collected by Simon Garfield in Our Hidden Lives (Ebury Press, 2004) were regular concert attenders in the late 1940s. It was both "the done thing" in English cities to go to symphony concerts and a refuge from the otherwise inescapable gloom of postwar austerity.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
TomW
June 30th, 2011
6:06 PM
Nice Norman - you write exactly what the 4% of the population who regularly attend symphonic concerts want to read. Back in the between the 1780s to the late 1800s, orchestras were ventures funded by subscribers and rich patrons. As a result, there weren't very many of them compared to today. What's happening today is that we're returning to that old model. Government is getting out of the culture business (wisely, for government shouldn't prop up all kinds of bad contemporary composers, painters, writers, etc. as they do in Europe). Sure the orchestra will survive, but there will be about 60% fewer - at least - of them then there are today. That's fine, since excellently recorded CD's and good stereo sets will make up the slack. Besides, the future of art music isn't "orchestras" but in specialized ensembles, such as L'Arpeggiata, Orchestre Revolutionaire et Romantique, and the Red Fish cafe. The idea that every city above 100,000 people should have an orchestra or opera company is going the way of the dodo.

Charles
June 30th, 2011
7:06 AM
Living in a somewhat distant northern suburb of New York City, I find a rich local diet of chamber music along with imaginative choral programs sung by amateurs led by accomplished professionals and supported by churches. Smaller scale classical music will never go out of fashion and doesn't need large endowments. A lot of it is supplied by musicians who can't find orchestral chair jobs in the cities. Bach did fine in an environment like this with its smaller scale forces. What was OK for him is OK for us...not to worry.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.