You are here:   Features > What Happens When The Band Stops Playing?
 
Now the orchestra says it cannot meet the rent at the over-bright new Verizon Hall, or feed the musicians' pension pot. Unless someone pumps in a few spare millions, the Fabulous Philadelphians are finished. "What would Philadelphia be without its orchestra?" cry traditionalists. Good question, but it's not the only one. Realists are demanding to know exactly what a city of six million wrestling with post-industrial decline gains from having a costly and cumbersome musical pantechnicon. Who needs a symphony orchestra? That's what they are asking, the world over.

Any competent historian would tell you that the crunch has been a long time coming. Symphony orchestras, evolving in the 1830s to meet subsistence needs of urban musicians and a rising demand for entertainment from a growing middle class, started out by playing music that was fresh and new. Leipzig, Vienna, Paris, Boston and New York led the way; Schumann, Brahms and Dvorak wrote the pops. Berlin gained an independent orchestra in 1882, Amsterdam in 1888, London in 1904, but these were small spring shoots before the big flowering.

The First World War precipitated a public need for musical comfort which, before radio and records, could be experienced only between the walls of a concert hall. The second war redoubled that urgency, audiences rushing to the ink-wet symphonies of Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Stravinsky and Vaughan Williams as to an oracle. By 1950, London had five full-time symphony orchestras, Vienna four, Berlin eight.

Attendance crossed all social barriers. In Angel Pavement, a 1930 novel by J. B. Priestley, a London clerk, Mr Smeeth, takes himself to Queen's Hall on a whim. They are playing Brahms, the first symphony. It was some time before he made much out of it. The Brahms of this symphony seemed a very gloomy, ponderous, rumbling sort of chap, who might now and then show a flash of temper or go in a corner and feel sorry for himself . 

What is significant about this response is that a lower-middle-class man with a very basic education feels that he has the wherewithal to understand great music on his own terms. By the time the big tune comes around in the finale, swelling his heart until it nearly chokes him, Smeeth is lifted out of his woes and endowed with hope for a better future. This perception of symphonic music as an improving grace was widespread. Two out of five Mass Observation diarists collected by Simon Garfield in Our Hidden Lives (Ebury Press, 2004) were regular concert attenders in the late 1940s. It was both "the done thing" in English cities to go to symphony concerts and a refuge from the otherwise inescapable gloom of postwar austerity.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Steve Meikle
July 1st, 2011
10:07 PM
The thing about sacred cows is that they are idols to be butchered. So Mr Lebrecht says exactly the wrong thing when he talks about how the dutch use to view art as a sacred cow. Such is asking to be butchered Does he want a starving populace to still find solace in symphony concerts? I find it interesting that the most prosperous and free land in 19th century Europe was England, the country Brahms called the land without music. Feed and liberate the people, and THEN give them music if there is any resoucr left. Oh, and BTW I was a professional musician also (a double bass player)

Anonymous
July 1st, 2011
7:07 PM
In the US, there is a huge disconnect between culture and entertainment. Many of the locales, Philadelphia & Detroit, to name just 2, are finding themselves in dire straits when it comes to funding for orchestras. On the other hand, these communities support multiple major league sports enterprises with budgets that dwarf those of all cultural institutions in the same region.

Louis Bialy
July 1st, 2011
4:07 PM
Lebrecht brilliantly analysed this problem in 1996 with the publication of his well-received book, "When The Music Stops." In that book he squarely lays the blame on the "multinationals" and the obscenely expensive music "stars". Oddly, his current analysis doesn't give a mention to these formerly nefarious players in the big business of musical performance and its seemingly voodoo economics.

Norma Procter
July 1st, 2011
1:07 PM
This article of Norman's is a warning, a warning to societies bound by the immediate, the X factor, the third rate. Somehow, orchestra's must be funded. Society needs it; people do flock to it. Think of the popularity of the Proms, Last Night ( a bit dumbed down) in particular. I was an orchestral wife during most of time our children were small. We survived the musician amidst us having three jobs - orchestral broadcasting musician, teacher in a music academy and school and private teaching - a regime of work from 8 in the morning to after the evening concert. And that is before the practice. Musicians are driven, driven to interpret for those of us who cannot read the dots. Marty Spence ( above) speaks of a banality of listening to an orchestra. Maybe he can judge. As a listener, a non-literate in terms of reading the score, I depend on the orchestral experience - those hieroglyphics on the page have to be translated for me. I have never found the experience banal, rather, overwhelming. That a band of disparate people with supreme skills can, with different world views, come together at the moment of the concert never ceases to amaze me. Society could learn something from this alone. The young people of Israel and Palestine come together to make music. There is something beyond comprehension to the power of music. Norman writes of the problems for the audiences as music develops. This is, of course true. Listen to the music of Oscar Edelstein, for example. Yet he is developing a popular audience in his own country, Argentina. This is a demonstration to me that a new orchestral music can develop to live alongside the great works of the long dead. Music needs orchestras, people need music. The funding must be found to continue the levels of skills needed.

Anonymous
July 1st, 2011
10:07 AM
I am finding it increasingly fascinating how so many people seem to ignore the gathering clouds on the horizon. This current economic situation is very, very serious. It's not a matter of redistribution of wealth or raising taxes or cutting budgets or who gets spared. No one gets spared; it's just a matter of time. Orchestras may be the canary in the coalmine but there is really very little we can do about it. In broader terms, once the US hits the brick wall (oh, and they will, mark my words), so will China and then we will no longer be wringing our hands over symphony orchestra subsidies, but whether we can feed and clothe our children. It's like the Trotsky quote: 'you may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you. In this case, you may not be interested in harsh economic realities, but they will come to bite everyone in the ass sooner or later. And you know what? I’m a professional musician!

martyspence
July 1st, 2011
1:07 AM
Watching a symphony is the equivalent of viewing a 'paint-by-numbers' painting. Yes, someone creative in the past did something amazing, but the militaristic perfection of all the players playing in time together is banal and uninteresting.

ECON
June 30th, 2011
11:06 PM
As long as there are musicians who play the classical repertoire, there will be an audience.

mj
June 30th, 2011
11:06 PM
And with Dudamel, it doesn't hurt a bit that he is a fabulous conductor!

Jon Jermey
June 30th, 2011
10:06 PM
Congratulations on successfully ignoring the elephant in the room! Of course it's the ready availability of cheap (and often free) recorded classical music from the best composers, conductors and performers which means that I can now sit at home in peace and comfort with a glass of beer and listen to Beethoven, rather than making a long trip to the city, wrestling with parking or public transport, paying enough for an entrance ticket to purchase a dozen CDs, and sitting through pieces by modern composers before I hear what I came for. It's called 'progress'. Get over it.

greg
June 30th, 2011
7:06 PM
It's all about balance. Orchestras need to reach new audiences by creative programming, using social media, embracing cross-overs with the multitudes of popular emerging styles, integrating with music education for all ages, engaging their own players in a shared vision of the future and combining fiscal prowess with great leadership. Public funding will follow, even if limited, if we have a wide variety of butts in seats enjoying the music.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.