You are here:   Anjem Choudary > Are We Losing The War For The Soul Of Islam?
 

I used to say that the future of this continent would be decided over whether Islam Europeanised or Europe Islamised. There were Muslim leaders back then — like Britain's Zaki Badawi — who preached just such a new form of Islam. Ten years on, the scorecard is far more mixed. Today, it seems to me that this will be a process of constantly winning and losing rather than outright victory or loss. But one thing is for sure: on current trends it will not just be the past but the future which will be a foreign country. They will, most certainly, do things differently there.

In the entire discussion on the meeting, absorption or integration of Islam in Britain several fundamental facts have to be accepted. The first is the undeniable importance of migration. Britain had no significant Muslim presence until the latter part of the last century. There was a negligible Muslim presence in Britain until postwar immigration brought waves of migration predominantly from the Indian subcontinent, and Islam played no important role in our history. By the 2001 census, there were around 1.5 million Muslims in England and Wales. By the 2011 census, that number was 2.7 million. Over a single decade the Muslim population had doubled — and that is not including the hundreds of thousands of people who are here illegally. If anyone in power had wanted to alter the vast increase in Muslim immigration during the post-9/11 period, to work on absorbing the people who were already here before welcoming in any more, they could have done so. But they did not and no politician looks set to do so in the near future. Even now it is deemed politically impossible to discuss such matters. And so — incapable of making a value judgment to limit Muslim immigration at the very moment that Muslim integration was becoming such an issue — we will be stuck with the reality of the growth of our Muslim population.

Today Britain's Muslim community is growing ten times faster than the rest of the population. Half of British Muslims are under the age of 25. And among young people under 25, one in ten are now Muslim. Conversions of Britons to Islam are also at an unprecedented high. In the decade since 9/11 more than 100,000 British people converted to Islam. Three-quarters of these were women. These facts — along with the fact that for the first time a minority of young Britons now identify themselves as Christian — means that if current trends continue, in the next 20 years or so there will be more Muslims in Britain than Christians. Some demographic studies suggest that on current trends Britain could have a Muslim majority by the middle of this century.

Of course trends do not always continue. It is possible that there will be a resurgence of Christianity, or a swift increase in atheism and/or secularism among Muslims. Or it is possible that something wholly unforeseen will occur. But while conceding the variables it is important not to ignore current likelihoods. An increased number of Muslims will inevitably lead to increased influence of Islam in the country, with all the things that come in its wake.

Second, we must accept that there is no reason why the process of integrating these people will be any more straightforward in the future than it has been up until now. Across Western Europe official government responses even to public concern over immigration as a whole — let alone some immigrations in particular — have been to condemn such concern as "racist". In the last couple of years the leaders of all three main political parties have conceded that it is not racist to have concerns about immigration. But they neither know what to do about the next step, nor can get beyond generalities about the need for "debate" or the sending around — as during this past summer — of occasional dog-whistles to pretend something is being done while the issue truly remains unaddressed.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Hegel`s Advocate
November 11th, 2013
4:11 PM
Mustapha Kyati of the Situationist Intenational published a concise idea for the radical transformation of Islam "from within": Burn Your Own Koran In A Public Place. I would add "And burn any copies of the Arabic translations of Hitler`s book Mein Kampf while you`re at it." Islam has no soul.Nor is there any "religious feeling" in Russia that Pussy Riot artists could have offended. It`s just the corrupt Kremlin mafia (ideology) getting paranoid and emotionally sadistic with women artists. Support Femen Art too. There`s a photo (artwork)on the femen website of a happy looking elder Roman Catholic nun (a real one) with her arms around two topless femen activists after a protest in St Peter`s Square,Rome. I don`t know if Pope Francis would be this convivial but who knows? The PC secularists are no use even to themselves. The atheists/believers/feminist movement led by Sister Teresa Forcades (Catalonia)has not been invited to the Vatican yet.

Abulhaq
November 6th, 2013
7:11 PM
Islam is certainly different. Would an Islamic England, not unthinkable, have theatres, opera, orchestras, libraries even art? Would cultural life revolve entirely around the religious? We know night-life would be very sober and unexciting compared to now. If salafism became normative in such an England minorities would certainly be in for a hard time. Perhaps only another religion, orthodox Catholicism?, is capable of stopping this islamization-by-stealth process in its tracks as PC secularism seems reticent.

Anonymous
November 5th, 2013
3:11 PM
I admire Douglas Murray tremendously. Few intellectuals in Britain possess his moral and physical courage. I think however that the title of his incisive essay indicates that his perspective is somewhat wrongheaded. The ‘soul of Islam’ is not ours to lose. My thesis is simple: any lasting change in Islam can only come from within. The ‘Religion of Peace’ (said with heavy sarcasm) is the bane of our time. The 20th century was nearly destroyed by political totalitarianism in the form of Communism, Fascism and Nazism. The 21st century risks being turned into a wasteland by Islamofascism. Political and religious totalitarianism rolled into one. Due to (principally) Labour’s calamitous immigration policies between 1997 and 2010, we will tragically find out ourselves whether ‘demographics is destiny’ – or at least those of us unfortunate enough to live into the fourth or fifth decades of this century. Only an Islamic Reformation and Enlightenment – from within – can change Islam. Sadly Murray’s essay and the writings of others like Raymond Ibrahim indicate that such an evolution is exceedingly unlikely. Tragically this century might see the death of the Enlightenment West and the birth of a cultural Frankenstein’s monster: Eurabia.

Michael22
November 5th, 2013
1:11 PM
Ibrahim you are wrong saying this. Khomeinism, Salafism and Wahhabism have a long history of terrorism, radicalism and violent fundamentalism since 13th century at least. So you can not say that "Dougla's learning" was biased.

Hegel`s Advocate
November 4th, 2013
10:11 PM
Anonymous is very welcome to stay outside my "pop psychology" ! Is `Anonymous` actually Naom Chomsky ? He does a good imitation of Chomsky at his worst.

James K
November 4th, 2013
5:11 PM
@charles soper "Theological demolition ought to be part of the solution." I agree. The Salafists want to restore the jihad and fighting spirit of the Muslim conquests, but the tragedy is that the story of the conquests is a myth. The same research suggests that "the historical Mohammed" was not the figure painted by Islamic tradition, and might not even have existed. Paradoxically, the very weakness of Islam's historical underpinnings will make it hard for Muslims to renounce them. If research showed only that the Islamic conquests were a myth, and therefore Salafism a fraud, a lot of Muslims would breathe a sigh of relief and continue practicing "Islam Three" (as the author calls it). However, I am not sure that the message would be accepted if it includes the non-existence of Mohammed himself - it might come across more as an affront than a work of theology. http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/50219 http://www.amazon.com/Did-Muhammad-Exist-Inquiry-Obscure/dp/161017061X

James K
November 4th, 2013
5:11 PM
The problems are most certainly not beyond the control of the political classes. Most of the 70% increase in our Muslim population in the last 10 years came from immigration. We *will* stop most immigration from Muslim countries - the only question is, do we do it now, or do we wait until Muslims form 30% or 40% of our population? The immigration of Muslims to the West, and their radicalisation, are parts of Saudi foreign policy. Our economy needs cheap energy, notably Saudi oil. We do more or less what the Saudi royal family want - and, since the siege at the Grand Mosque in 1979, the Saudi royal family has had to do what the radicals want. We are literally giving away our countries in return for the cheap oil that gives us a comfortable life; and the deliberate inaction of our politicians is simply a part of that Faustian bargain. http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/us-government-protection-of-al-qaeda-ter... 500 years from now, historians will compare the relationship between Saudi Arabia and the West with the Atlantic slave trade. African kings sold their people for what history books describe as "trinkets": often consumables such as gin that would let them lead a more comfortable life. We too are exchanging our countries for a consumable - crude oil.

Michael Taylor
November 3rd, 2013
2:11 PM
Excellent piece. Part of the problem is the framework of political discourse around all acts of Islamic terrorism in this country. A rush to find the extreme right reaction and condemn that as an appeal for calm. It happened after Lee Rigby's murder, which became a polarised race to condemn the opportunism of the EDL, without pausing to consider why the EDL came into being in the first place.

Anonymous
November 3rd, 2013
10:11 AM
"Hegel`s Advocate"- what you wrote was the most incoherent load of gibberish I've read all day. "Dialectical Materialism" and "revolutionary materialism" are ideological constructs of the "Kremlin" before liberalization of the 90's. Zizek is a self-styled "leninist"- named after guy who made the "Kremlin" the seat of Russian power. What does Pussy Riot have to do with anything? What are they the only people in the world in jail for disorderly conduct? Oscar Wilde,Mae West or Duchamp- what?! I'm not even going to go in to your pop psychology.

Anonymous
November 3rd, 2013
4:11 AM
If people weren't so in denial about the problem, the following measures could be implemented: Confine immigration from Muslim majority countries to conscious, avowed progressive Muslims, ex Muslims and religious minorities. Take a clue from China and tax parents on the number of children they bear, starting with the second child and progressively more for those that follow. This would disproportionately affect Muslims, but since racial background would not be considered, the usual charges of racism might be avoidable. Get rid of the idea that immigrants without citizenship, should have the same rights as others. They should be on probation. If any show signs of not fitting into the more evolved values of Western civilization, whether it be family size or tolerance, you should be able to deport them. Citizenship should not be available until the third generation. In the Middle East, the the partition idea should enter the conversation. Religious minorities would fare better if they had their own state. Western policy should put oil and other economic concerns behind helping whatever liberal elements they can find. Energy independence would deny billion of petrodollars to Wahhabists, and Khomeniists who have used this money to promote extremism throughout the Islamic World. The increasing popularity of Geet Wilders shows that Muslim immigration to Holland may eventually be stopped. Britain needs the same kind of politician. The development of a leftism that follows the Euston Manifesto, pointing out the incompatibility of such core leftist values as gender equality and secularism with the corrupt multi culti strain of leftism that predominates would be helpful.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.