You are here:   Anjem Choudary > Are We Losing The War For The Soul Of Islam?
 

I used to say that the future of this continent would be decided over whether Islam Europeanised or Europe Islamised. There were Muslim leaders back then — like Britain's Zaki Badawi — who preached just such a new form of Islam. Ten years on, the scorecard is far more mixed. Today, it seems to me that this will be a process of constantly winning and losing rather than outright victory or loss. But one thing is for sure: on current trends it will not just be the past but the future which will be a foreign country. They will, most certainly, do things differently there.

In the entire discussion on the meeting, absorption or integration of Islam in Britain several fundamental facts have to be accepted. The first is the undeniable importance of migration. Britain had no significant Muslim presence until the latter part of the last century. There was a negligible Muslim presence in Britain until postwar immigration brought waves of migration predominantly from the Indian subcontinent, and Islam played no important role in our history. By the 2001 census, there were around 1.5 million Muslims in England and Wales. By the 2011 census, that number was 2.7 million. Over a single decade the Muslim population had doubled — and that is not including the hundreds of thousands of people who are here illegally. If anyone in power had wanted to alter the vast increase in Muslim immigration during the post-9/11 period, to work on absorbing the people who were already here before welcoming in any more, they could have done so. But they did not and no politician looks set to do so in the near future. Even now it is deemed politically impossible to discuss such matters. And so — incapable of making a value judgment to limit Muslim immigration at the very moment that Muslim integration was becoming such an issue — we will be stuck with the reality of the growth of our Muslim population.

Today Britain's Muslim community is growing ten times faster than the rest of the population. Half of British Muslims are under the age of 25. And among young people under 25, one in ten are now Muslim. Conversions of Britons to Islam are also at an unprecedented high. In the decade since 9/11 more than 100,000 British people converted to Islam. Three-quarters of these were women. These facts — along with the fact that for the first time a minority of young Britons now identify themselves as Christian — means that if current trends continue, in the next 20 years or so there will be more Muslims in Britain than Christians. Some demographic studies suggest that on current trends Britain could have a Muslim majority by the middle of this century.

Of course trends do not always continue. It is possible that there will be a resurgence of Christianity, or a swift increase in atheism and/or secularism among Muslims. Or it is possible that something wholly unforeseen will occur. But while conceding the variables it is important not to ignore current likelihoods. An increased number of Muslims will inevitably lead to increased influence of Islam in the country, with all the things that come in its wake.

Second, we must accept that there is no reason why the process of integrating these people will be any more straightforward in the future than it has been up until now. Across Western Europe official government responses even to public concern over immigration as a whole — let alone some immigrations in particular — have been to condemn such concern as "racist". In the last couple of years the leaders of all three main political parties have conceded that it is not racist to have concerns about immigration. But they neither know what to do about the next step, nor can get beyond generalities about the need for "debate" or the sending around — as during this past summer — of occasional dog-whistles to pretend something is being done while the issue truly remains unaddressed.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
AJimnonymous
January 13th, 2015
2:01 PM
Multiculturalism is complete, total and utter nonsense. Islam and the West are two scorpions in a bottle.

Charlie South
January 25th, 2014
1:01 AM
A main aspect is resentment.The World is increasingly being dominated by the ability to develop new technologies and catch up with and use existing ones. India and China have developed little new technology but they have learnt and developed their technological base at an incredible rate. The muslim World is falling being not only the west but also China and India. The software in India is largely developed in Bangalore, which is within the Hindu heartlands. The arabic world, excluding oil exports less than Finland and in one year over 5,000 patents were granted in Israel and only 50 in Iran. If one considers the boundary of knowledge to be flexible then it can expand to hold new discoveries. In 1400 the doors of ijtihad were closed in Islam. one cannot have closed mind,stop deductive reasoning based on observation and measurement and develop new technologies. If one closes the female form in a shroud one cannot produce an athlete or ballerina. If one looks at womens' athletic performances they have greatly improved in the last 70 years. Very few books are translated into arabic yet many are translated into English which enables new ideas to be discovered. The reality is that aggressive Islam is based upon a lack of faith in their abilities .If they had the ability, then Pakistan and Bangladesh would out perform India and China in learning new technologies and catching up with the west. In about 1260, roger Bacon wrote about the difference between Faith and Reason and started the British on the path of empiricism- examination of the facts. In 1258 the Mongols sacked Baghdad, destroyed The House of Wisdom and Islam stopped evolving with regard to science and technology. Both India and China are developing because they have opened their minds.

Anonymous
January 6th, 2014
5:01 PM
Hegel. I would be quite happy to write an article for the magazine. I think you would find it very interesting and informative.

hegel`s advocate
December 9th, 2013
9:12 PM
I actually agree with Anonymous about Islam. Comments here are serious and part of D Murray`s article. So unless Anonymous has an article for publication on the subject (and I don`t) then keep the comments flowing. I`m sure Mr Murray is pleased his article has initiated discussion here.

Anonymous
December 7th, 2013
1:12 AM
What Muslims do is the problem. Notwithstanding how admirably kind and well-meaning and non-violent many may be, ALL Muslims give reverence (knowingly or otherwise) to the memory of a mass murderer, rapist, liar, thief, pedophile, bigamist, sadist warmonger. And to his manual on how to conduct aggressive jihad against the unbelievers. Sorry, the only solution to the uncivil aspects of Islam is the recognition that it is not so much a genuine religion as a hoax scam founded by a vile man for his own selfish aggrandisement. It belongs only in the history books and museums along with Zeus and Jupiter. Fortunately such groups as Council of Ex-Muslims are growing and that is the way forward. In my experience most people who call themselves Muslims are profoundly ignorant of what they think they believe anyway. And actually have Christian vales. So the End is Nigh for this terrible mistake of history.

Anonymous
December 4th, 2013
5:12 PM
Hegel. This article offers nothing but despair, and is unable to articulate a meaningful solution to the problem it purports to identify. Is this really the apex of Murray's thinking in respect of Islam? It lacks scholarly depth, exhibiting no real engagement or understanding of the subject matter, whilst also lacking any evidence of engaging with Islam except through the prism of secondary experience. There are very many critiques to be made of Islam, Islamism and Islamic Fundamentalism, but but it remains notable Standpoint continues to articulate a populist and superficial discourse, as evidenced by the individuals given space in support of this narrative.

hegel`s advocate
November 26th, 2013
2:11 AM
Anonymous is jealous. Who`s paying Anonymous to play total mediocrity ? with Islamist suicide bombers attacking and killing people in the Iranian embassy Douglas Murray`s article is more relevant than ever.

Anonymous
November 24th, 2013
6:11 PM
Oh Douglas, is this really the best that you can produce after '[...] studying and thinking about Islam [...] for half (your) life'? And how much did The Hertog / Simon Fund for Policy Analysis pay for this sloppy mess?

Alfie
November 20th, 2013
12:11 AM
In our equalist society arguments over the "veil" would come into sharper focus if more young males, especially those of the working (or non-working) class, realised they also had the right to wear a veil, or "ski mask" to protect their modesty, or privacy, (or identity) when in public, or in the local off licence etc. Should they be refused service or custom, or be told to remove said item by police officer, would it not be a case for discrimination and a job for the DPP...in a truly equalist society, of course.

Sagar
November 16th, 2013
1:11 AM
The author refers to the migration of Muslims from the 'Indian subcontinent'. Perhaps a fiber split was necessary? Very clearly, there's a huge difference in approach to life and Islam of Muslims of the Indian origin and of Pakistani - for example. There are few names, if any, of the former kind to be found in discussions about Islamic dogmatism. The author would do well to consider this and its reasons in his future analyses.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.