You are here:   Education > We Can't All Make the Grade
 
When we turn to the 40 to 60 per cent of IQ that is environmental, children of the professional classes also have an advantage, but little of it has to do with money. Talking to infants and reading bedtime stories to toddlers every night do not cost money - but such behaviour goes from "almost universal" to "rare" as social class goes from top to bottom. To refrain from smoking, alcohol and drugs during pregnancy costs no money. But such restraint is once again correlated with social class, and children of the professional class are the beneficiaries. How are school reforms to compensate for these environmental advantages of the professional classes?

Another environmental factor brings me to the moral reason that stands in the way of equalising the educational success of those in the professional classes and those towards the bottom - moral, at least, for those of us who think that whether a baby has a father as well as a mother is a moral issue. One more empirical finding that is no longer in dispute in the United States among scholars of child development is that children do best when they are raised by married biological parents.

Children raised by a divorced mother do next best (whether she remarries doesn't make much difference). Children raised by an unmarried mother do worst of all. Let me emphasise that these results are found after controlling for a host of socio-economic background variables. Poor and rich children alike benefit from growing up with both biological parents and suffer from being born to a lone mother. In the United States, even the scholars who used to believe otherwise have changed their minds on this one.

The advantages of growing up with married biological parents do not include higher academic ability. But they do include all sorts of other advantages that affect success in school. Children raised by both biological parents are more likely to grow up psychologically healthy, accustomed to a regular routine and self-disciplined than children who grow up with unmarried mothers (again, even after controlling for socio-economic variables). They are more likely to have someone watching over their homework and noticing if there are problems at school.

If the incidence of marriage and lone parenthood were evenly distributed throughout the social classes, the advantages of marriage would not benefit the children of the professional classes. But lone parenthood is concentrated in the lowest socio-economic levels of English society. Consider the examples of Wokingham and Southwark, local authorities that epitomise the socio-economic top and bottom. As of the 2001 census, 13 per cent of Wokingham households with dependent children had a lone parent. In Southwark that figure was 45 per cent.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Phil Rushton
September 27th, 2008
1:09 AM
Charles Murray has hit the nail on the head again. Most of can accept that some of our siblings are genetically handsomer, healthier, more athletic, or more socially charming than ourselves. Why can't we accept that some of them are more intelligent? We probably do when it comes to within-family relations but find it difficult to do when looking between families. But it is just as true. It is time to become realistic and take off the rose colored glasses. caused

MunsterFellow
September 25th, 2008
2:09 PM
Mr Murray - perhaps instead of dismissing thousands UK students and their abilities and singing the praises of a education system based on the extremely dubious and unproven concept that a IQ gene or gene combination exists, you would be better served referencing the OECD's PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) statistics. The same countries nearly always appear on the top twenty list of reading, scientific and mathematical skills. Of interest is the best performing nation Finland (1st in science/2nd in mathematics and reading skills) with its entirely state owned and operated system. East Asian nations with their "any child can succeed as long as they study hard" attitude also figure prominently. As for the UK, its students (whose efforts you dismiss with contempt)come 14th in science (above Switzerland) and 17th in reading ability (above Germany). The US meanwhile, where the majority of your psychobabble originates from, doesn't even get a single slot in the top twenty. Mr Murray, next time more research as less idle speculation. Back of the class!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Related content
More Features
Popular Standpoint topics