You are here:   Education > We Can't All Make the Grade
 
The educational romantics have an answer for that one too: such results merely show how terrible all the schools are by comparison with what they could be. To fix the problem, the Left advocates innovative teaching techniques and curricula. The Right (in America at any rate) advocates greater use of vouchers and other methods of privatising the schools. Once again, the United States has the most voluminous data for assessing the success of both strategies.

For decades, the US government has given grants for what are now called Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) demonstration programmes. Using the grant, the recipient school implements one of a wide range of teaching and curriculum models. In 2003, a comprehensive meta-analysis of the 29 most widely implemented models was published. The average effect size - the difference between performance of students in the experimental group and students in the control group, weighted by the standard deviation - was +0.15. It is an effect even smaller than the one observed in the studies of pre-school interventions cited earlier. An effect size of +0.15 means, for example, that a child at the 25th percentile goes to the 30th percentile.

To put it another way, no model of school reform that has been tried in the United States has demonstrated, with evidence that withstands scientific scrutiny, the kind of dramatic impact on academic performance that the educational romantics say is possible. I have been unable to find rigorous examinations of experimental learning models in England. I hope this article will unearth empirical evidence of dramatic success that I might have missed - which I look forward to examining with a fine?tooth comb.

American advocates of school privatisation (I am one) fare no better than the advocates of government-sponsored reforms. Vouchers and tax credit experiments have been successful in many ways - providing safer and more nurturing school environments, freeing able students from peer pressure not to perform and installing more substantial curricula. But the reading and maths scores of students in these schools compare favourably with students in government schools only when the comparison is with the worst inner-city schools. When the comparison is with ordinary government schools, the differences have been trivial.

Does the English experience of the past decade refute me? When it came to power in 1997, the Labour Government set out to achieve ambitious increases in test scores, and it succeeded. English Key Stage 2, Key Stage 3 and GCSE scores all bear witness to this achievement.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Phil Rushton
September 27th, 2008
1:09 AM
Charles Murray has hit the nail on the head again. Most of can accept that some of our siblings are genetically handsomer, healthier, more athletic, or more socially charming than ourselves. Why can't we accept that some of them are more intelligent? We probably do when it comes to within-family relations but find it difficult to do when looking between families. But it is just as true. It is time to become realistic and take off the rose colored glasses. caused

MunsterFellow
September 25th, 2008
2:09 PM
Mr Murray - perhaps instead of dismissing thousands UK students and their abilities and singing the praises of a education system based on the extremely dubious and unproven concept that a IQ gene or gene combination exists, you would be better served referencing the OECD's PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) statistics. The same countries nearly always appear on the top twenty list of reading, scientific and mathematical skills. Of interest is the best performing nation Finland (1st in science/2nd in mathematics and reading skills) with its entirely state owned and operated system. East Asian nations with their "any child can succeed as long as they study hard" attitude also figure prominently. As for the UK, its students (whose efforts you dismiss with contempt)come 14th in science (above Switzerland) and 17th in reading ability (above Germany). The US meanwhile, where the majority of your psychobabble originates from, doesn't even get a single slot in the top twenty. Mr Murray, next time more research as less idle speculation. Back of the class!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Related content
More Features
Popular Standpoint topics