You are here:   Education > We Can't All Make the Grade
 
Insofar as such schools exist in England, of course the schools can do much better. But in the United States those schools enrol a few per cent of all students. Ordinary government schools in the US have decent facilities, orderly and nurturing classrooms and teachers who range from bad to excellent, with most clustered in the category of competent. Reading and maths are taught energetically and with substance. The main problem with ordinary schools in the US is that history, science and the arts have been stripped of their content in much the same way that reports say they have been stripped in England.

I will assume that most English schools outside the worst neighbourhoods are roughly comparable to my description of an ordinary American school. How much can an ordinary English school do to raise the academic performance of its students? If the question is framed in terms of teaching them bodies of factual material about history, politics and citizenship, science and the arts, the increases in learning across the board could be dramatic. But if the question is reading and maths, the answer is that the quality of the school makes surprisingly little difference.

This counterintuitive result was first exposed in the United States in 1966 with the publication of the Coleman Report. Named after the sociologist who led it, the magnitude of its effort remains unmatched by anything done since. The sample for the study included 645,000 students nationwide. Before Coleman's team began its work, everyone (including Coleman) thought that the study would document a relationship between the quality of schools and the academic achievement of the students in those schools. Any other result seemed impossible.

To everyone's shock, the Coleman Report instead found that the quality of schools explained almost nothing about differences in academic achievement. Measures such as the credentials of the teachers, the extensiveness and newness of physical facilities, money spent per student - none of the things that people assumed to be important in explaining educational achievement were important in fact. Family background was far and away the most important factor in determining student achievement.

The Coleman Report came under intense fire, but reanalyses of the Coleman data and the collection of new data over many years continue to support the core finding that the quality of schools just doesn't make much difference in mean student test scores. Move away from the awful inner-city schools to the schools that are ordinary or better, and much of the slack has been taken out of the room for improvement in academic achievement for the average student.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Phil Rushton
September 27th, 2008
1:09 AM
Charles Murray has hit the nail on the head again. Most of can accept that some of our siblings are genetically handsomer, healthier, more athletic, or more socially charming than ourselves. Why can't we accept that some of them are more intelligent? We probably do when it comes to within-family relations but find it difficult to do when looking between families. But it is just as true. It is time to become realistic and take off the rose colored glasses. caused

MunsterFellow
September 25th, 2008
2:09 PM
Mr Murray - perhaps instead of dismissing thousands UK students and their abilities and singing the praises of a education system based on the extremely dubious and unproven concept that a IQ gene or gene combination exists, you would be better served referencing the OECD's PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) statistics. The same countries nearly always appear on the top twenty list of reading, scientific and mathematical skills. Of interest is the best performing nation Finland (1st in science/2nd in mathematics and reading skills) with its entirely state owned and operated system. East Asian nations with their "any child can succeed as long as they study hard" attitude also figure prominently. As for the UK, its students (whose efforts you dismiss with contempt)come 14th in science (above Switzerland) and 17th in reading ability (above Germany). The US meanwhile, where the majority of your psychobabble originates from, doesn't even get a single slot in the top twenty. Mr Murray, next time more research as less idle speculation. Back of the class!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Related content
More Features
Popular Standpoint topics