You are here:   Education > We Can't All Make the Grade
 
It is a gradient that, given fine-grained tests, will be found to apply from Year 1 to university. In Year 1, it is indeed true that almost all children can learn everything that Year 1 teaches. Some will learn it faster than others, but almost everyone can learn to read and do maths at Year 1 level. But every year the number who cannot keep up increases. By the time children reach their teens, some large proportion - a third at least, arguably more - should not be on a continuing academic track. By the end of secondary school, that proportion is around 80 per cent or 90 per cent.

The last refuge of the educational romantics is the extremely high proportion of children of the professional classes who do well in school. Surely that must be explained by affluence and access to the best schools. Or as Adonis put it: "There is no genetic or moral reason why the whole of society should not succeed to the degree that the children of the professional classes do today." Actually, there are both genetic and moral reasons, along with environmental ones.

The genetic reason arises from two politically unfashionable but empirically irrefutable truths.

The first is that IQ, which is nearly coincident with academic ability as I defined it, is somewhere around 40 per cent to 60 per cent heritable. The evidence for the substantial heritability of IQ has become so overwhelming that it is no longer a subject of serious debate, except over the exact figure. The second is that people in the professional classes are, on average, far above the rest of the population in IQ.

Presenting evidence for the high IQ of professionals is superfluous for successful physicians, engineers, barristers, scientists or university lecturers. Possession of an IQ in at least the top 10 per cent is virtually guaranteed by the nature of the academic filters required to finish the professional training. But such evidence is plentiful even when we move to occupations such as business executive. There are many thick people working in business, but studies of the relationship of tested IQ to career success indicates that the overwhelming majority of successful executives are somewhere in the top 10 per cent of IQ.

And so it comes to pass that when a man and woman in the professional classes set out to have a baby, it is extremely likely that at least one gene contributor has a high IQ. In today's society, it is ever more likely that both contributors will be in that category. Think of all the couples you know who consist of two professionals, or ones in which perhaps only one works outside the home but the other has an advanced academic degree. Given this kind of genetic background and a heritability of 40 to 60 per cent for IQ, the children of the professional classes have a meaningful academic advantage at the moment of birth (as a group - individual exceptions abound).

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Phil Rushton
September 27th, 2008
1:09 AM
Charles Murray has hit the nail on the head again. Most of can accept that some of our siblings are genetically handsomer, healthier, more athletic, or more socially charming than ourselves. Why can't we accept that some of them are more intelligent? We probably do when it comes to within-family relations but find it difficult to do when looking between families. But it is just as true. It is time to become realistic and take off the rose colored glasses. caused

MunsterFellow
September 25th, 2008
2:09 PM
Mr Murray - perhaps instead of dismissing thousands UK students and their abilities and singing the praises of a education system based on the extremely dubious and unproven concept that a IQ gene or gene combination exists, you would be better served referencing the OECD's PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) statistics. The same countries nearly always appear on the top twenty list of reading, scientific and mathematical skills. Of interest is the best performing nation Finland (1st in science/2nd in mathematics and reading skills) with its entirely state owned and operated system. East Asian nations with their "any child can succeed as long as they study hard" attitude also figure prominently. As for the UK, its students (whose efforts you dismiss with contempt)come 14th in science (above Switzerland) and 17th in reading ability (above Germany). The US meanwhile, where the majority of your psychobabble originates from, doesn't even get a single slot in the top twenty. Mr Murray, next time more research as less idle speculation. Back of the class!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Related content
More Features
Popular Standpoint topics