You are here:   Anjem Choudary > Are We Losing The War For The Soul Of Islam?
 

And although there will be those for whom a return to the sources will be like returning to a deep well of Islamic thought, the nature of that well and the nature of those sources will continue to present a problem which may well be insuperable. It cannot be stressed often enough that when Christians go back to the roots of their faith they find a man who was —even if you do not believe him to be God — an extraordinary, peaceable and moral teacher. When Muslims go back to the source of their faith they too find a moral teacher, but one with other points on his CV too. The history of Christianity may certainly have been been bloody and difficult. But how much bloodier and more difficult would it have been if Jesus had ordered his followers (even if only on occasion) to slay and enslave their enemies rather than implore them — in that extraordinary if not always achievable teaching — to turn the other cheek? Christianity has had a terrible legacy of anti-Semitism. But how much worse would it have been had Jesus not been a Jew himself and anti-Semitic pogroms not been a wicked extrapolation of scripture but rather an emulation of the behaviour of Christianity's founder?

 

Over the last decade I have observed some of the repercussions of all this with my own eyes. I have travelled across the Muslim world, from North Africa to the Middle East and Far East. I have seen Muslim countries and peoples in peace and war. I have seen rockets fall and seen their effects, witnessed terror close up and spoken to its victims. I have also seen an uncomfortable number of friends and allies — Muslim and non-Muslim — targeted for speaking critically about Islam and its problems. Friends have had assassins come to their doors and I have looked into the faces of a number of extremists and terrorists myself.

I have also travelled across Europe, and must admit that it can be terrifying to see the way in which the unsolved problems which Islam brings with it are dangerously simmering. Every European country is now experiencing this in the same ways. From the streets of Scandinavia to the outskirts of Paris, the northern cities of England to the East End of London, we have a set of societies in our midst about which even the use of the word "integration" must be regarded as some cosmic joke. In all of these countries Muslim communities — generally through no fault of their own — have grown up alongside the rest of the society. What has been created are not multicultural societies but parallel societies. Every country faces similar challenges and all are going through similar debates. Yet none seems able or willing to deal directly with any but the secondary and tertiary issues of the problem. They encourage Muslim leaders to "condemn" extremism but do little to tackle it. They praise "moderates" when they should be insisting on Muslim progressives. Lacking the resolve to change this, we all cling to an unfounded hope that the absorption of tens of millions of Muslims into Europe will change nothing very significantly.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
AJimnonymous
January 13th, 2015
2:01 PM
Multiculturalism is complete, total and utter nonsense. Islam and the West are two scorpions in a bottle.

Charlie South
January 25th, 2014
1:01 AM
A main aspect is resentment.The World is increasingly being dominated by the ability to develop new technologies and catch up with and use existing ones. India and China have developed little new technology but they have learnt and developed their technological base at an incredible rate. The muslim World is falling being not only the west but also China and India. The software in India is largely developed in Bangalore, which is within the Hindu heartlands. The arabic world, excluding oil exports less than Finland and in one year over 5,000 patents were granted in Israel and only 50 in Iran. If one considers the boundary of knowledge to be flexible then it can expand to hold new discoveries. In 1400 the doors of ijtihad were closed in Islam. one cannot have closed mind,stop deductive reasoning based on observation and measurement and develop new technologies. If one closes the female form in a shroud one cannot produce an athlete or ballerina. If one looks at womens' athletic performances they have greatly improved in the last 70 years. Very few books are translated into arabic yet many are translated into English which enables new ideas to be discovered. The reality is that aggressive Islam is based upon a lack of faith in their abilities .If they had the ability, then Pakistan and Bangladesh would out perform India and China in learning new technologies and catching up with the west. In about 1260, roger Bacon wrote about the difference between Faith and Reason and started the British on the path of empiricism- examination of the facts. In 1258 the Mongols sacked Baghdad, destroyed The House of Wisdom and Islam stopped evolving with regard to science and technology. Both India and China are developing because they have opened their minds.

Anonymous
January 6th, 2014
5:01 PM
Hegel. I would be quite happy to write an article for the magazine. I think you would find it very interesting and informative.

hegel`s advocate
December 9th, 2013
9:12 PM
I actually agree with Anonymous about Islam. Comments here are serious and part of D Murray`s article. So unless Anonymous has an article for publication on the subject (and I don`t) then keep the comments flowing. I`m sure Mr Murray is pleased his article has initiated discussion here.

Anonymous
December 7th, 2013
1:12 AM
What Muslims do is the problem. Notwithstanding how admirably kind and well-meaning and non-violent many may be, ALL Muslims give reverence (knowingly or otherwise) to the memory of a mass murderer, rapist, liar, thief, pedophile, bigamist, sadist warmonger. And to his manual on how to conduct aggressive jihad against the unbelievers. Sorry, the only solution to the uncivil aspects of Islam is the recognition that it is not so much a genuine religion as a hoax scam founded by a vile man for his own selfish aggrandisement. It belongs only in the history books and museums along with Zeus and Jupiter. Fortunately such groups as Council of Ex-Muslims are growing and that is the way forward. In my experience most people who call themselves Muslims are profoundly ignorant of what they think they believe anyway. And actually have Christian vales. So the End is Nigh for this terrible mistake of history.

Anonymous
December 4th, 2013
5:12 PM
Hegel. This article offers nothing but despair, and is unable to articulate a meaningful solution to the problem it purports to identify. Is this really the apex of Murray's thinking in respect of Islam? It lacks scholarly depth, exhibiting no real engagement or understanding of the subject matter, whilst also lacking any evidence of engaging with Islam except through the prism of secondary experience. There are very many critiques to be made of Islam, Islamism and Islamic Fundamentalism, but but it remains notable Standpoint continues to articulate a populist and superficial discourse, as evidenced by the individuals given space in support of this narrative.

hegel`s advocate
November 26th, 2013
2:11 AM
Anonymous is jealous. Who`s paying Anonymous to play total mediocrity ? with Islamist suicide bombers attacking and killing people in the Iranian embassy Douglas Murray`s article is more relevant than ever.

Anonymous
November 24th, 2013
6:11 PM
Oh Douglas, is this really the best that you can produce after '[...] studying and thinking about Islam [...] for half (your) life'? And how much did The Hertog / Simon Fund for Policy Analysis pay for this sloppy mess?

Alfie
November 20th, 2013
12:11 AM
In our equalist society arguments over the "veil" would come into sharper focus if more young males, especially those of the working (or non-working) class, realised they also had the right to wear a veil, or "ski mask" to protect their modesty, or privacy, (or identity) when in public, or in the local off licence etc. Should they be refused service or custom, or be told to remove said item by police officer, would it not be a case for discrimination and a job for the DPP...in a truly equalist society, of course.

Sagar
November 16th, 2013
1:11 AM
The author refers to the migration of Muslims from the 'Indian subcontinent'. Perhaps a fiber split was necessary? Very clearly, there's a huge difference in approach to life and Islam of Muslims of the Indian origin and of Pakistani - for example. There are few names, if any, of the former kind to be found in discussions about Islamic dogmatism. The author would do well to consider this and its reasons in his future analyses.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.