You are here:   Civilisation >  Screen > The Cowardice Of John Le Carré
 
Great acting, doubtful plot: Tom Hiddleston as Jonathan Pine in the BBC’s adaptation of “The Night Manager” (©BBC/The Ink Factory/Des Willie)


The approval of former MI6 agent John le Carré has not guaranteed the authenticity of the BBC’s dramatisation of The Night Manager. Those who know about the Middle East could barely make it through the first episode.

My colleague Peter Beaumont, the Guardian’s Jerusalem correspondent, was in Tahrir Square during the revolution. He turned off The Night Manager when a murderous member of the Mubarak oligarchy ordered an improbably large assortment of weapons from a villainous English arms dealer. Mubarak had no shortage of weapons in 2011; he just could not persuade his forces to use them. The notion that his cronies would be trying to buy more rather than trying to persuade the army to fight comes from a definition of “realism” so capacious it includes Eurofighters on sale on the black market, and governments so unconcerned by weapons proliferation that they keep their inspectorates in cold, understaffed offices.

I shouldn’t have been surprised. Le Carré’s post-Cold-War politics are best described as more Pilgerish than Pilger. Connoisseurs of his public statements can tick every space on the bingo card. Le Carré believes that corporations brainwash the bovine masses (check) on behalf of the imperial American hegemon (check) which is itself controlled by a conspiracy of right-wingers (check) who are pulling our puppet strings at the behest of — guess who? — the Jews (full house!). Or as le Carré explained, the neoconservatives are “appointing the state of Israel as the purpose of all Middle Eastern and practically all global policy”.

Then there is the self-pity, that most deplorable affectation of Western intellectuals, who have never once faced the smallest threat of persecution or punishment for their writing. At one point during the last decade, le Carré compared himself to the German-Jewish diarist Victor Klemperer, who miraculously survived life under the Nazis. Liberals of a certain age remember that when the Ayatollah Khomeini’s assassins imitated the Nazis and threatened Salman Rushdie’s life the Klemperer de nos jours opined that Rushdie had brought death on himself by insulting the great religion of Islam.

Rushdie once told me that he did not think  le Carré scrabbled for excuses for those who would murder his fellow writers because he was a supporter of religious totalitarianism. Rather, he could not forgive Rushdie for writing an unfavourable review of The Tailor of Panama in which he said le Carré could not create convincing female characters. I am not sure this explanation helps le Carré, and he still cannot create convincing female characters.

After writing his three great novels — The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and The Perfect Spy — it is easy to agree with the conclusion of Private Eye’s critic, who said le Carré had become “his own tribute band”. You know now how his books will go. There is a decent Englishman. He comes across skulduggery. He is persuaded to fight it by an honest spy, who teaches him tradecraft, but instead finds he must fight Western corporations and governments whose cynicism knows no limits. In the case of The Night Manager, the reason, of course, why the British government is unconcerned by illegal weapons sales is that MI6 is in the pay of the villainous arms dealer.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
AnonoBert
March 30th, 2016
2:03 AM
Even those first three classic novels are basically paens to moral equivalence.

j b whitfield
March 28th, 2016
7:03 PM
Cohen is right, Le Carre has become Bill Hayden.

افسانه خلعتبری
March 28th, 2016
6:03 PM
For people like Le Carré " west is the only enemy worth fighting" because they are pretty sure the WEST would never hit back.Let them try to fight their cause in Iran,China, Zimbabwe. .. etc

Euphorbia
March 28th, 2016
2:03 PM
This is from a review I wrote on IMDB in 2005. Despite certain divergences in character and plot, this movie version of "The Russia House" does do justice to John Le Carre's twisted tale. Perhaps this is because so much of Hollywood shares Le Carre's own moral obtuseness -- wishing bureaucratic tyranny upon the rest of the world, while insulating itself with money. Le Carre cannot tell the difference between West and East, between the bumbling mediocrity of western bureaucracies, and the unremitting evil of the Soviet bureaus, which owned everything in the evil empire, right down to peoples' souls. "The Russia House" was the first of his many post Cold War novels to make it clear that he could not, or would not. Yet the man does write brilliantly. Le Carre is one of the great masters of English prose. Therefore one can almost forgive his blockheadedness, while one enjoys his rich descriptions, his twisted characters, and his sharp storytelling. It's only the morning after finishing one of his novels, or the hour after watching a movie adaptation such as this, that one's head begins to throb with the bitter, pointless, imbecility of his world view.

Barry Weisman
March 28th, 2016
12:03 PM
Be world-weary, exhausted--seeing no real difference between the materialistic, paranoid, uninteresting, crude United States and the quasi-ascetic (yes, almost spiritual) Soviet Union embodied by Karla's cigarettes.Very reluctantly, you'll grudgingly stay this time in the center of both--although intellectually you already chose your side.

Sander Fredman
March 28th, 2016
10:03 AM
Le Carre needs to come out of the old cold and get into the new one

Lawrence James
March 27th, 2016
10:03 AM
Having done some research on the trafficking of arms ( aka 'defence procurement' ) in Africa during the Cold War period,I found Le Carre most convincing.

PJ
March 26th, 2016
11:03 AM
Still, I have thoroughly enjoyed his novels. So, really, honestly, fuck it. An analysis too far, becomes uninteresting.

Jonathan Maze
March 26th, 2016
11:03 AM
Unfortunately I agree with this assessment of JLCs later work which has adopted a rather silly conspiracist tone. Stella Rimmington wrote a good review of Le Carre once that contains the lines: "Now the Cold War is over and the goodies have won, the world has not become a better place, and it makes him angry." And there are no obvious baddies anymore so the baddies become officialdom, corporations etc. This is not the complexity and balance that I loved about his early work. The Little Drummer Girl brilliantly shows how Israel has become a victim of its own success: the militarism and hawkishness that enabled the state to survive has metastasised into a brutal colonial power capable of justifying practically anything to itself. Late Le Carre still preferable to anything by the increasingly ludicrous Salman Rushdie. He is still a giant though and I'd rather read him a hundred times more than the insufferable Salman Rushdie.

Gillian Lazarus
March 25th, 2016
1:03 PM
This is spot on and I speak as a long time devotee of Le Carre, recently only too aware of the pattern adumbrated in Nick Cohen's article. However, The Little Drummer Girl and The Tailor of Panama didn't strike me at the time as unsympathetic to Jews. The anti west inclination in Le Carre's novels since then may signify a regrettable change.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.