You are here:   Ahmadiyya > Persecuted Muslims Who Love Life in England
 

Such numbers are bound to cause difficulties. White Britons are now in a minority in London, Luton, Leicester and Slough. Morden is one of those areas where the majority are leaving, although not on the scale of Barking and Dagenham, where the white British population fell by a third in the last decade, or Newham, where they now account for just 16 per cent of residents.

There have also been some terrible mistakes in the way that migration has been handled. Soon after the Jews arrived in east London a number of prostitutes were murdered by a still unknown male to whom an enterprising journalist (most probably) gave the name Jack the Ripper. Rumour spread around Spitalfields that the killer was a Jew, and the Jews prepared for the worst. Such accusations were nothing new in Russia, and they would inevitably be followed by the authorities unleashing a massacre. But in the morning the city went on as before, and though rumours persisted the newcomers realised that here was a country where the rule of law trumped prejudice and hatred, and minorities could prosper as equal citizens.

It was also a culture with a framework into which immigrants could integrate. Britain's long-established Sephardic Jewish community, embarrassed by their newly-arrived co-religionists and nervous about the prejudice they might trigger, created the Jews Free School, a quite phenomenonally successful institution which had as its remit that it would take little Poles and Russians and turn them into English gentlemen. And so it did.

A century later, when immigrants from the Commonwealth were arriving in much larger numbers, British culture had changed. It was not that Pakistani immigrants did not want their children to become English gentlemen, but that Englishmen no longer knew of or believed in such an idea. From the 1970s the education system introduced what would become known as multiculturalism, an anti-intergrationist philosophy that encouraged the children of migrants to cling to their own identities. It was a disastrous policy.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
carlo
June 8th, 2013
11:06 PM
'the security is not to protect them from BNP supporters.'that seems to imply that the security is to protect them from....oh dear ! ..anyway i hope to hear positive things in the media about the Ahmadis as those beliefs would go a quite a way to encourage peaceful co-existance with other communities

Anonymous
May 31st, 2013
2:05 PM
'PeeJay' makes me very sad, and somewhat ashamed. If I hadn't read of the Ahmadiyya before, perhaps I too would assume that this article was the anti-bigotry bull which is all too often spammed across the media, covering up the reality to protect us from ourselves. But in this article that isn't the case. The Ahmadiyya really do sell Poppies; which makes you think, why don't other Muslims do the same? Obviously, we're all just trying to get on with our lives, but some of us have identities which conflict with the mainstream national identity and see much of Britishness as a hostile 'Other', and some of us have an 'us and them' attitude, and some of us are totally unchallenged on these attitudes. 'Some of us' could potentially be anyone, but today the most high profile disaffected group are mainstream Muslims. Seeing that non-Muslims cannot distinguish between Mainstream Muslims and Ahmediyya, and so both groups are subjected to the same criticism and social pressures, it would appear that the disaffection of Muslims is mainly their own responsibility, or rather, the responsibility of the influential members of the community. So all credit to the Ahmadiyya for not hating us as much as everyone else does, and, to mainstream Muslims *, get your act together! *For example, Mo Ansar, who wrote an article not long ago, explaining why he never gives to the Poppy Appeal (conflict of loyalties, basically,) which hopefully he'll revise, now that HfH have rejected monies from the EDL.

peejay
May 14th, 2013
8:05 PM
If they really love Britain, and want to integrate, why, why oh why did they insist on building a gigantic mosque for 10 000 people? Surely they must have realised it would be contentious to say the least? But they knew that, whatever the protests, they would eventually get their way! They always do, don't they? That's why most people don't trust them, whatever they say.

anonymus
May 3rd, 2013
5:05 AM
Ahmadis stand for peace since 124 years. 1. Ahmadis do not believe in armed type Jihad. 2. They believe in peaceful preaching. 3. They believe in live and let live. 4. They believe in love for all hatred for none. 5. They believe in religious liberty for all. 6. They believe no one should be punished for beliefs alone. Every one should be punished for crimes. 7. There is no compulsion in any religion. 8. A peaceful person of any faith has nothing to fear, nor will he/she be grieved. 9. It is necessary to be truely loyal and faithful to the country where one lives. 10. Ahmadis are spiritual people with least politics. 11. Ahmadis do not press any one for the law of Shariah in the present state of the world as a global village. 12. Ahmadis respect all the heads (seniors) of all religions and do not abuse any one. 13. The Ahmadis do not rise against any established government. Also they do not take part in strikes. It is strictly forbidden. 14. Ahmadis believe in peaceful, friendly dailogue between people of different faiths. 15. Ahmadis want to serve the people, and want to do deeds for the benefit of all people. The list could go on and on. I am not any official of the Ahmadiyah community, just an ordinary member. Above is written for general information.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.