
Several historians, including myself, comment here in the Guardian on the putative rise of the BNP. A remarkable unanimity prevails, although David Kynaston is a bit more pessimistic.
What is more striking is the collapse of the Labour vote, rather than the rise of the BNP. The latter only benefited from proportional representation; in a straight first past the post system they'd lose their deposits. I also think the UKIP vote simply represents the fact that these were European elections, where their issue bulks large. Again, in a real contest, their vote would migrate back to the Conservatives.
Post your comment
Michael Burleigh is a historian and the author of 10 books. These include The Third Reich: a New History, Earthly Powers, Sacred Causes and Blood & Rage: A Cultural History of Terrorism. He is on the Advisory Board of Standpoint.
- Lord Judge's Sentences
- Move Along, Nothing to See Here
- There's Nothing Like a Piano-playing Dame
- Does Engagement with Terrorists Save Lives?
- New Readers Start Here
- Mastersingers — from Cardiff to Cohen
- Introduction
- Iran and Iraq: A Stark Contrast
- About this Blog
- Welcome to the new Standpoint website
- Transparency in Government?
- Downfall
- Tramp of the Jackboot?
- A little story from Germany
- Interesting Times
- Abu Qatada
- Check Out Memoirs
- Why isn't Auntie reporting Aunty?
- The Worm Turns

















