
This piece from the Times may interest our small Spanish following, as well as anyone contemplating a trip to Biarritz. The piece also makes clear that the Basques have a very high degree of autonomy already, so it is not at all clear what Eta is fighting for- except to 'honour' the blood already spilled. This is reminiscent of Macbeth, who waded so far into blood that he couldn't go backwards or forwards. Once again an uncompromising line (on both sides of the Pyrenees) seems to be neutralising a lethal terrorist movement, thereby rejecting the "its good to talk" fixation of the British.
After my piece on the Tamils (see below) various bits of BBC radio have been trying to get me on discussion programmes. Evidently I jolted their habit of asymmetric indulgence towards liberation movements, guerrillas, militants and so forth. As the cases of Eta and the Tigers prove, talks are usually an excuse for terrorist entities to rearm and regroup. Even the softheads around Zapatero seem to have grasped this.
Post your comment
Michael Burleigh is a historian and the author of 10 books. These include The Third Reich: a New History, Earthly Powers, Sacred Causes and Blood & Rage: A Cultural History of Terrorism. He is on the Advisory Board of Standpoint.
- There's Nothing Like a Piano-playing Dame
- Does Engagement with Terrorists Save Lives?
- New Readers Start Here
- Mastersingers — from Cardiff to Cohen
- Introduction
- Iran and Iraq: A Stark Contrast
- About this Blog
- Welcome to the new Standpoint website
- Transparency in Government?
- Downfall
- Tramp of the Jackboot?
- A little story from Germany
- Interesting Times
- Abu Qatada
- Check Out Memoirs
- Why isn't Auntie reporting Aunty?
- The Worm Turns
- History-Schools-Discuss
- Shaken not Stirred

















