You are here:   Arab Spring > An Islamist Winter?
 
An Islamist Winter?
January/February 2012


Even then, Islamists owe part of their victory to the shady deals they made with the military and the remnants of the security services of the fallen despot. In Tunisia, an-Nahda echoed the military's claim that pro-democracy parties "undermined national security". In Egypt, the Brotherhood backed the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces against protesters in Tahrir Square. In Morocco, the PJD attacked those who called for reducing the powers of the king as "agents of sedition".


Perhaps because they know that they cannot secure an outright majority in any election, Arab Islamists are opposed to a presidential system in which the head of state is directly chosen by universal suffrage. They also know that it is much harder for pro-democracy parties and groups to come together to form coalitions than it is for Islamists. Instead, Islamists demand a new constitution aimed at creating a British-style system in which the parliament is the centre of power with the prime minister as its executive arm. Here, too, both Turkey and Iraq serve as models for Islamists in the "Arab Spring" countries.


Accepting elections has not been easy for most Islamists who believe in the Islamic system of shura (consultation) under which the caliph or the wali al-amr (the emir or the ruler in charge) decides all matters with advice from the ulema. In Islamic tradition power does not emanate from the people's will as expressed through elections, a Western tradition. Islamic power derives from bay'ah (fealty) as expressed by the ulema, the notables and tribal leaders. Thus most Islamists enter elections holding their noses. To them, the move represents a major theological-ideological concession to the "Zionist Crusader" political thought developed in the West. Not surprisingly, many radical Islamists consider participation in elections as a tactical move designed to propel them into power. Once in power, they would drop the electoral system and revert to "Islamic" politics.


We should welcome the elections and recognise their results. These provide instant pictures of the state of opinion in countries where fear and silence prevented us from knowing what exactly was going on in the minds of the people. Now we know that parties harping on Islamic themes have not been able to win the support of anything more than a third of the electorate. If one takes into account the average size of the turnouts, Islamists of all shades represent between 20 and 30 per cent of the electorate across the Arab world. And that is in countries where between 85 and 100 per cent of the population are Muslims.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
A reader from NY
January 2nd, 2012
12:01 PM
While I agree with the premise and conclusion of this piece, I am as bewildered as the previous reader ("Orientalism") by Mr. Taheri's depiction of the Turkish government as a "model" of secular Islamic democracy. As Turkey's Islamist PM Erdogan vies for accession to the EU, on the one hand, and to fill the regional power vacuum left by Mubarak's ouster and the Arab Spring, on the other, one must look to events of the last 18 months and wonder how independent a truly secular government in an Islamist society can be, particularly when that society derives its intellectual, moral and spiritual guidance from its religious scholars and theologians - NOT its politicians. Moreover, to offer Turkey's NOMINAL separation of state and religion as a beacon to the Arab world is as naive as the presumption that the Islamic Brotherhood's newfangled secular campaign platform is to be taken at face value. I've often thought the Occupy Wall Street activists would do well to look East for a better appreciation of their "99 vs. 1" mantra; but, if this movement has anything in common with the Arab Spring, it's that both were fomented by passions rather than a plan. One can rail against social injustice, economic hardship and political corruption, but there is a world of difference between identifying a problem and knowing how to fix it. Absent a solution and the means to implement it, there can be no remedy - or revolution.

Orientalism
January 1st, 2012
7:01 AM
Informative and well summed up. However, some may argue that we are seeing the following now in Turkey as the military security regime that protected secularism is being dismantled.... the description of Iran post 1979 revolution resonates with many Turks these days... you could replace mullahs for the ruling AKP party. 'the mullahs and their minions were infiltrating the apparatus of the state, placing their people in strategic positions within the bureaucracy, the judiciary and the media, and creating paramilitary squads. They accepted elections on the basis of one man, one vote, once' And this also applies to Turkey when talking about military repression of Islamist parties.. 'They know how to hide their true colours and bide their time. If it is foolish to overestimate their strength when they are part of a broader picture, it is deadly to underestimate their capacity for doing harm when they seize all levers of power.' Some may say, if the popular vote wants a more pro-Islamic run country so be it, but as the writer also mentions 'obsessions such as the Israel-Palestine issue, anti-Americanism, vilification of minorities and anti-woman programmes' are old Islamists discourse and are anti-democratic, in my opinion. Today,we are seeing a visible backwards trend in Turkey on these issues. Turkey noteably has the highest number of journalists in prison. Most live in fear of reprisal for having a critical voice. Wire-tapping by the pro-government police force is common. Turkey as a model?

Sarat Kumar
December 26th, 2011
8:12 PM
It is not really important whether the Islamists allow tourists to drink alcohol or even whether muslim women would be veiled, scarved or not. Will they: Amend constitutions to allow non muslims to occupy the highest political, military and social offices in Arab and Muslim countries? Allow all religions and atheists to preach and propagate their beliefs peacefully? Adopt constitutions without references to Islam? As someone who has lived in the Middle East for 14 years, let me tell you, Mr Taheri (I know you dont need my telling) the Arabs in particular and Muslims in general are light years away from these concepts.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.